Europe Sees Military Troops Shortfalls 03/14 06:09
BRUSSELS (AP) -- In the year after Russia launched outright war on Ukraine,
NATO leaders approved a set of military plans designed to repel an invasion of
Europe. It was the biggest shake-up of the alliance's defense readiness
preparations since the Cold War.
The secret plans set out how Western allies would defend NATO territory from
the Atlantic to the Arctic, through the Baltic region and Central Europe, down
to the Mediterranean Sea. Up to 300,000 troops would move to its eastern flank
within 30 days, many of them American. That would climb to 800,000 within six
months.
But the Trump administration warned last month that U.S. priorities lie
elsewhere. Europe must take care of its own security, and those goals now seem
questionable. Mustering just 30,000 European troops to police any future peace
in Ukraine is proving a challenge.
Billions of euros are being shifted to military budgets, but only slowly,
and the Europeans are struggling to fire up production in their defense
industries.
Beyond funding, tens of thousands more European citizens might have to
complete military service, and time is of the essence. NATO Secretary-General
Mark Rutte has warned that Russian forces could be capable of launching an
attack on European territory in 2030.
Concerned about Russia's intentions, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk wants
to introduce large-scale military training for every adult male, and double the
size of Poland's army to around 500,000 soldiers.
"If Ukraine loses the war or if it accepts the terms of peace, armistice or
capitulation ... then, without a doubt -- and we can all agree on that --
Poland will find itself in a much more difficult geopolitical situation," Tusk
warned lawmakers last week.
The scale of Europe's military personnel shortage
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimates that Europe,
including the U.K., has almost 1.5 million active duty personnel. But many
can't be deployed on a battlefield, and those who can are hard to use
effectively without a centralized command system.
The number of Russian troops in Ukraine at the end of 2024 was estimated to
be around 700,000.
NATO troops are controlled by a U.S. general, using American air transport
and logistics.
Analysts say that in the event of a Russian attack, NATO's top military
officer would probably dispatch around 200,000 U.S. troops to Europe to build
on the 100,000 U.S. military personnel already based there.
With the Americans out of the picture, "a realistic estimate may therefore
be that an increase in European capacities equivalent to the fighting capacity
of 300,000 U.S. troops is needed," the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank
estimates.
"Europe faces a choice: either increase troop numbers significantly by more
than 300,000 to make up for the fragmented nature of national militaries, or
find ways to rapidly enhance military coordination," Bruegel said.
The question is how.
Making up the numbers
NATO is encouraging countries to build up personnel numbers, but the
trans-Atlantic alliance isn't telling them how to do it. Maintaining public
support for the armed forces and for Ukraine is too important to risk by
dictating choices.
"The way they go about it is intensely political, so we wouldn't prescribe
any way of changing this -- whether to go for conscription, elective
conscription, bigger reserves," a senior NATO official said on the condition of
anonymity because he wasn't authorized to brief journalists unless he remained
unnamed.
"We do stress the point that fighting with those regional plans means that
we are in collective defense and likely in an attrition war that requires way
more manpower than we currently have, or we designed our force models to
deliver," he added.
Eleven European countries have compulsory military service: Austria, Cyprus,
Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, and
non-European Union nation Norway. The length of service ranges from as little
as two months in Croatia to 19 months in Norway.
Poland isn't considering a return to universal military service, but rather
a reserve system based on the model in Switzerland, where every man is obliged
to serve in the armed forces or an alternative civilian service. Women can
volunteer.
Belgium's new defense minister plans to write a letter in November to around
120,000 citizens who are age 18 to try to persuade at least 500 of them to sign
up for voluntary military service. Debate about the issue goes on in the U.K.
and Germany.
Confronting the challenges
Germany's professional armed forces had 181,174 active service personnel at
the end of last year -- slightly lower than in 2023, according to a
parliamentary report released Tuesday. That means it's no closer to reaching a
Defense Ministry target of 203,000 by 2031.
Last year, 20,290 people started serving in the German military, or
Bundeswehr, an 8% increase, the report said. But of the 18,810 who joined in
2023, more than a quarter -- 5,100 or 27% of the total -- left again, most at
their own request during the six-month trial period.
The German parliament's commissioner for the armed forces, Eva Hgl, said
that army life is a hard sell.
"The biggest problem is boredom," Hgl said. "If young people have nothing
to do, if there isn't enough equipment and there aren't enough trainers, if the
rooms aren't reasonably clean and orderly, that deters people and it makes the
Bundeswehr unattractive."
At the other end of the scale, tiny Luxembourg has unique demographic
challenges. Of its roughly 630,000 passport holders, only 315,000 are
Luxembourgers. The number of people of military service age -- 18 to 40 -- is
smaller still.
Around 1,000 people are enlisted. That's small compared to some European
powers, but bigger per capita than the U.K. armed forces. Recently, Luxembourg
-- where unemployment is low and salaries are high -- has struggled to find
just 200-300 military personnel.
Military service comes with many challenges too, not least convincing
someone to sign up when they might be sent to the front, and hastily trained
conscripts can't replace a professional army. The draft also costs money. Extra
staff, accommodation and trainers are needed throughout a conscript's term.